Skip to content

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 235 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear Adrian, thanks for giving your vote to this issue! We’ll try hard to keep the user interface simple – promise!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    chris commented  · 

    Although all is said already:

    There is no way around being "KISS enough" to be flexible to any future changes.
    I vote for a focus on improvement of solid baseline requirements:

    - usability: easy edit
    - mobile: you have to
    - clear and capable object model
    - standards; provide OPML (or else) for others to create views in an ecosystem.

    chris supported this idea  · 
  2. 172 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    chris supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    chris commented  · 

    Hi,

    I just came across checkvist and I like it very much, good job!

    Although this feature would really improve checkvist a lot.

    Some years ago I tried to use leoeditor.com as a PIM and the
    main feature for that in leo was creating "clones" of nodes
    which is exactly what I would be looking for.