chris

My feedback

  1. 217 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Checkvist Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Dear Adrian, thanks for giving your vote to this issue! We’ll try hard to keep the user interface simple – promise!

    chris commented  · 

    Although all is said already:

    There is no way around being "KISS enough" to be flexible to any future changes.
    I vote for a focus on improvement of solid baseline requirements:

    - usability: easy edit
    - mobile: you have to
    - clear and capable object model
    - standards; provide OPML (or else) for others to create views in an ecosystem.

    chris supported this idea  · 
  2. 146 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    37 comments  ·  Checkvist Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    chris supported this idea  · 
    chris commented  · 

    Hi,

    I just came across checkvist and I like it very much, good job!

    Although this feature would really improve checkvist a lot.

    Some years ago I tried to use leoeditor.com as a PIM and the
    main feature for that in leo was creating "clones" of nodes
    which is exactly what I would be looking for.

Feedback and Knowledge Base