How can we improve Checkvist?

Embed existing lists/sublists, not just hyperlinks (similar to symlinks). Was: checklist of checklists

Active links. Ability to nest checklists. Checklist could be your own or someone elses that you are collaborating on. This provides the opportunity for more complex tasks

115 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mtoswalt shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    30 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Mario T. Lanza commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The circular reference concern can be handled in several ways.

        1) Don't allow them
        2) Don't preload symlinks; dynamically expand them as users opens them and don't allow them to open items already appearing above in the node hierarchy

      • AdminKirill Maximov (Admin, Checkvist) commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Hello Yuriy,

        Thanks for your comment. I suppose regarding hard link/soft link issue - probably there won't be a difference in implementation, all links will be soft. Unfortunately, the current data structure in Checkvist does not allow hard links, because each item is coupled with its list. Of course, there will be an indicator where the 'master' item is located in UI.

        Thanks again for the comment,

      • Юрій Бабак commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Hardlinks for items, symlinks for branch — really critical feature.

        Often if you have a complex structure it is needed to show same items or same branch in few places (different contexts). Not showing link to other item/branch, but show their actual content.

        Currently we have to copy items for this and it is hard to maintain them as you have to edit item is many places.
        Hard-links for items symlinks for branch should solve this problem — you edit item in one place and all other instances updated.

        But there will be needed some indication that item has other instances, and probably some warning when editing.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This would put checkvist in a whole new level for me. It would allow me to organize in a much cleaner way. Would love this.

      • Peter Moran commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Bump because this would be an amazing power feature. My use case is I would love to use this to make a mega list, allowing me to get a total overview of everything. Another case is it would allow me to email in new items to specific nodes in my list or share specific nodes. The more nodes and lists can become interchangeable, the more powerful features can become.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This is the one thing I want most. Checkvist is an amazing tool and has kept me much more organized, but this feature would allow for some amazing opportunities for collaboration and organization. I haven't upgraded to the Pro version of checkvist yet (although that may change with the winter sale), but this would make it an insta-buy. And I would likely get my entire department at work to use it.

        I see this was suggested a long time ago, and I'm sure there are good reasons for it not being implemented yet (complexity, higher priority tasks, etc). I don't pretend to know or understand the reasons, but I hope it is still in the pipeline. You guys are making a great product, keep it up.

      • Eric commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        +1 This seems essential for true collaboration, delegation, and DRY (Don't repeat yourself) design.

      • EHansen commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Jonathan Sheller had a similar request, with many more details which was declined and pointed here instead. I prefer Jonathan's description but assume as it was considered similar then the implementation of this which you do will work is his suggested manner, and then it has my vote :)
        His was titled:
        Embed existing lists/sublists, not just hyperlinks (similar to symlinks)

      • SM commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Being able to embed/nest a specific node/tree from a different list would definitely streamline project management in Checkvist.

      • Jonathan Sheller commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Still holding out hope for this feature. The ability to effectively embed nodes within other lists, symlink style so that they're the same data element and are "synced" (i.e. if someone edits the sub-items in the Node which is in list A, those edits will also show up in the identical Node which is embedded in list B since it is one and the same Node, just displaying in two places). I think it would be a real killer feature.

      • Kimon commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This is a fantastic idea. It makes a lot of sense for collaboration, e.g. if you are building up a complex knowledge document. Different team members could work on different areas of research, and then a master document could be composed just using inline, dynamically embedded outlines.

        Somebody mentioned that this might bloat Checkvist into a full-on project manager, but I disagree. This feature need not have any significant effect on the software design, or your workflow, if you opt not to use it.

      • Olli Savolainen commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        +1 for this one. my use case: I often have hard time deciding whether to have items as subitems of 'xx' them into separate lists.

        Really, they are often subitems of a big list. But that big list may have so many items that organizing it becomes very painful. When I find an item I want to move, I then need to search for the parent item I want to move it under. So I end up 'xx'ing the parent items, so they can easily be moved things under. But here I lose flexibility: I now have to move explicitly to the new lists to view their contents, and they are now out of context.

        So being allowed to show contents of a linked list inline would help me get the best of both worlds: give me quick move targets 'inside' the current list, and see everything in context.

      • Bill Mattes commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I would like to expand on this great (and under-appreciated) feature: this could be used to create a "master" Checkvist that referenced all one's other Checkvists. Why? The "master" checkvist could have a description of the purpose and context of each checkvist and/or a summary.

        I would encourage Checkvist to highlight this great capability!!

      • Jonathan Kolodner commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        "Yes, please!" to nesting. The ability to subset one list into another would really compliment the extract feature, and I could really use it right now for creating summary lists that I can then share selected pieces (the extracted/nested parts) with others

      • AdminKirill Maximov (Admin, Checkvist) commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Thanks everyone for the comments and suggestions for this feature.

        So far, I cannot name any estimates when we will start working on this - but definitely not before the coming winter. Not because we don't consider it important - but because there are more important tasks we have to solve.

        Thanks again,
        KIR

      • senorsmile commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This would be the killer feature that makes checkvist better than all other. There is the feature of focusing, but that would sort of require many of my lists to be moved to a single list. And it doesn't allow sharing sublists, like previously described.

      ← Previous 1

      Feedback and Knowledge Base